The tradition surrounding the Dravyasaṃgraha has not left the text standing alone; it has been accompanied by significant commentarial literature that seeks to unfold its dense metaphysical content. Within this stream of interpretation, a particularly prominent place is given to the classical commentary attributed to Amṛtacandra Sūri (Amṛtacandra Ācārya), which is often treated as the principal and most authoritative exegesis. This work carefully explicates the verses, especially those dealing with the fundamental substances (dravya) and related categories, and thus serves as a key guide for entering the doctrinal world that the root text presupposes. For many students of Jain metaphysics, this commentary functions almost as a lens through which the original is habitually read.

Beyond this, the tradition also bears witness to later sub-commentaries (ṭīkās) composed within Nemicandra’s own lineage and the broader Digambara scholastic milieu. These works tend to elaborate on Amṛtacandra’s explanations, clarifying technical points and harmonizing the Dravyasaṃgraha with other authoritative scriptures. Although the specific titles and authors of these sub-commentaries may vary across manuscript and regional traditions, their role is consistent: they deepen the interpretive conversation and ensure that the text remains integrated into the living fabric of Jain philosophical reflection. In this way, the Dravyasaṃgraha is not merely a concise doctrinal summary but the center of an ongoing hermeneutical dialogue.

Alongside these classical and sub-commentarial works, there exist a range of more recent commentaries and translations in Sanskrit and various modern Indian languages. Produced by ācāryas and paṇḍits over the last centuries, these writings generally follow the interpretive line established by Amṛtacandra, while presenting the material in a form accessible to contemporary readers. They often combine exposition with comparative notes and practical reflections, allowing the terse verses to speak to new audiences without severing their connection to the older scholastic tradition. Taken together, this layered corpus of commentaries shows how a seemingly concise text can become a vast field of contemplation, where each generation reads, clarifies, and rearticulates the same foundational insights.