The text in question can be approached by those unfamiliar with Eastern spiritual traditions, but it is not an easy or introductory work. Its dialogues arise from the Advaita Vedānta milieu and presuppose some openness to inquiries such as the nature of consciousness and the question “Who am I?”. The structure is not systematic; rather, it is a series of spontaneous exchanges that provide little philosophical scaffolding or gradual exposition. As a result, readers without prior background may find themselves confronted with ideas that are presented in a direct and uncompromising manner, with minimal contextual explanation.

Several features make the book challenging for newcomers. Technical terms and concepts—such as Self, witness, non-duality, and māyā—are often used without careful definition, and the teaching style can appear blunt, paradoxical, or repetitive. The non-dual perspective itself can seem to stand at odds with common materialist assumptions, and the lack of step-by-step argumentation may leave some readers disoriented. Those who are not already acquainted with Eastern philosophical frameworks may therefore need patience and a willingness to look up unfamiliar terminology.

At the same time, there are aspects that can make the work accessible and valuable even for beginners who are earnest and contemplative. The central thrust of the teaching is remarkably simple and consistent: to discover one’s true nature as awareness itself, rather than as the body–mind. The dialogues frequently draw on everyday examples and emphasize direct experience over religious formalism or elaborate doctrine, so engagement does not require adopting a new belief system. For readers who can tolerate ambiguity and paradox, this directness can be experienced as refreshing rather than obscure.

For those without prior exposure to Eastern spirituality, the book is best approached as a demanding but potent pointer rather than as a gentle introduction. Slow, reflective reading, with readiness to revisit passages and to research key terms, can make the material more intelligible. Many readers may find it helpful to supplement the text with more introductory explanations of Advaita Vedānta or non-dual thought, or at least with a glossary or commentary. Under such conditions, the work can serve as a powerful catalyst for inquiry, even if it is not the most straightforward first step on the path.