There are several criticisms of Ajivika, a deterministic philosophy that emphasizes the role of fate in human life. One of the main criticisms is that it promotes a fatalistic attitude, where individuals believe that their actions and choices do not matter because their fate is predetermined. This can lead to a lack of motivation and effort, as individuals may feel that they have no control over their lives.

Another criticism of Ajivika is that it denies the concept of free will. According to this philosophy, everything that happens is predetermined and there is no room for individual agency or choice. This goes against the widely accepted belief that humans have the ability to make choices and shape their own lives.

Ajivika also faces criticism for its rigid and deterministic view of karma. In this philosophy, karma is seen as a fixed and unchangeable force that determines one's fate. This can be problematic as it does not allow for the possibility of growth, learning, and change. It also places blame on individuals for their suffering, rather than acknowledging external factors or societal structures that may contribute to their circumstances.

Furthermore, Ajivika has been criticized for its lack of compassion and empathy towards those who are suffering. As this philosophy believes that everything is predetermined, it can lead to a lack of empathy towards those who are struggling or experiencing hardship. This can create a sense of detachment and apathy towards the suffering of others.

Another criticism of Ajivika is that it can be used to justify social inequality and oppression. The belief in predetermined fate can lead to a mindset that accepts social hierarchies and injustices as inevitable and unchangeable. This can prevent individuals from taking action to address and challenge systemic issues.

In addition, Ajivika has been criticized for its narrow and simplistic view of the world. This philosophy reduces the complexities of life to a simple cause and effect relationship, ignoring the many nuances and complexities of human existence. It also ignores the role of individual agency and the potential for personal growth and change.

In conclusion, while Ajivika may offer a sense of comfort and explanation for the uncertainties of life, it has faced several criticisms for its fatalistic and deterministic view of the world. Its rigid beliefs and lack of consideration for individual agency and societal factors have been met with skepticism and criticism.